Translating Justin's latest widdle tantrum
- Posted by meat.brai.n on September 19th, 2007 in
And even if Justin hasn't addressed the issue, the comment will be removed so that Justin doesn't have to address it. Much easier that way.
Up until now I've been lax in permanently banning folks that choose to repost comments I've removed, but I will not hesitate to close registration and make my comments section a priveledge, and not a right.
Justin will make this site even more of an echo chamber if folks don't stop pointing out his distortions, evasions, and lies.
If you want to make a point about something I wrote, move to the forums.
And Justin will remove your comments there, too, if he doesn't like them.
My comments section is for folks that I believe have real debate, not people who read my site for the sole purpose of discrediting any and all points I make.
Justin's comments section are for people who don't challenge him too directly. Tiptoe around Justin's ego... it's a fragile thing.
Some have chosen to continuously repost in my comments section as a means to promote their own liberal websites, many of them having no real content.
Justin will invent imaginary reasons why people are reposting comments, just to have an excuse to delete them that doesn't look quite so cowardly.
These folks run sites with "attacking" as their primary purpose. You're not going to leach my readership by advertising here, so don't waste your time.
Justin actually believes that his site is soooooo popular that people would post here just to be seen. BWAhahahahahahahaha…
All of this being said, I will continue to implement the same policies I have been implementing for over two years now. If you write "Justin Higgins sucks" and I choose to change your comment to "I'm a big fat asshole," too bad.
Justin reserves the right to lie about what you said, under your name. It's so much easier than actually taking part in a debate.
Cite the specific law, moron
"There are plenty of laws that cover harassment, liable and slander."
Yes there are, Mom. But of course, this isn't the answer to my challenge (which you deleted from your comments section, as you knew instinctively that you were too frakking stooooooopid to answer it):
Cite the specific law that makes "verbally abusing 16 and 17 year old boys on the internet" illegal.
Run away again, little cretin.
Check this out and feel free to comment
I took him to task on his inexcusable behavior.
http://hoosierarmymom.wordpress.com/2008/03/11/socialist-attack-trolls/
Unrelated-
-but a nice side-item to the Fox 'right to lie' story and an example of what the corporate-owned news media is really loyal to. From a Salon.com story-
"...As the panel called witnesses, Sumner Redstone, CEO of Viacom (CBS's owner), declared his interest in the 2004 election. "I look at the election from what's good for Viacom. I vote for what's good for Viacom. I vote, today, Viacom," he said... "I don't want to denigrate Kerry," said Redstone, "but from a Viacom standpoint, the election of a Republican administration is a better deal. Because the Republican administration has stood for many things we believe in, deregulation and so on. The Democrats are not bad people ... But from a Viacom standpoint, we believe the election of a Republican administration is better for our company..."
Hilarious idiot Cao
That's so you, Cao. You made a liar of yourself by posting a single sentence.
I enjoy the fun!
I'll read anything!
you're so full of shit meatball
that's why you're relegated to the dank dark depths of this forum.
Nobody pays attention to you, and nobody should.
why the loony left is entertaining reading your drivel is beyond me...except that...he's the loony left, lol
Justin makes a lot of claims
Justin makes a lot of claims... but if you look closely, he doesn't bother to produce the facts to back most of them up. Apparently we are supposed to believe what Justin says just because he says so.
Justin hasn't addressed his misrepresentation of my argument at all. You've seen how he deals with being challenged: he deletes the challenge and continues to lie.
Nope... it was a flat out lie
None of the above. Justin could not formulate a rational response to the evidence that Fox News defended the right to lie to its viewers in court. Therefore, he did the only thing he could think of, and emulated Fox News -- he lied about what I had written.
Isn't it humorous, and ironic, that Justin entitled a recent post "Profiles of the Gutless", when he displays some of the most gutless behavior imaginable?
Quite Disappointing
(I've been instructed to take this to the forums so I am resubmitting the post I wrote about the disagreement between meatbrain and Justin regarding Justin's misinterpretation of a statement meatbrain said.)
(I believe this was deleted because it was attached to meatbrain's post that keeps getting deleted.)
Well looneyontheleft, maybe Justin will and maybe he won't... What is really disappointing, in my opinion, is that this case is pretty open and shut:
meatbrain said the following:
Justin interpreted meatbrain and said this:
Now perhaps Justin didn't mean to go that far, perhaps he read quickly and, just honestly, misinterpreted meatbrain, or perhaps Justin is truly biased and believes FOX News can do no wrong.
But it is quite clear, meatbrain's original statement is correct and Justin misrepresented it (intentionally or not). (Please see my previous post on this topic.) FOX News (and, perhaps more importantly, five other media organizations filed friends of the court in support of FOX News) did in fact argue in court that it has "the right to lie or deliberately distort news reports on public airwaves". This is very clear. In my post (linked above) I provided the direct link to Florida's Second District Court of Appeals decision (which is only five or so pages long) that anyone can read for themselves.
Clearly, meatbrain did not disqualify FOX News simply because "they're... well... FOX News". I believe Justin should apologize or at the very least remove the offending quote:
Im just being a tool
-I know he's avoiding it. It would be nice if he would address it. I think he claims he has, I just don't recall seeing it.
Its hard to debate feelings, which is all lots of people have regarding their politics. On all sides, not just conservatives.
No connection here
Justin and I aren't connecting, and we never will. Justin hasn't the intellectual courage to debate his views. That's why he relegates his critics to the forums, where he can safely ignore them.
Awwwww...
Im so happy you two are connecting over this.
Welcome
Welcome to the forums meatbrain. Thank you for moving this discussion here.