Right On The Right

This coming from the hack who refuses to defend or condemn the huge racial divide in the Democrat party. Is the racial divide that exists in the Democrat race (as shown in the poll above) ok? ANSWER NOW.

You're still a coward, Justin. You're still afraid to answer two simple questions:

1) In the context of 20th century American politics, what was the "Southern strategy", and which American political party employed it?

2) In the year 2000, which American political operative set up a poll that asked voters in the South Carolina primary, “Would you be more or less likely to vote for John McCain... if you knew he had fathered an illegitimate black child?” Which political party did that operative work for?

Run away, little liar.

This coming from the hack who refuses to defend or condemn the huge racial divide in the Democrat party. Is the racial divide that exists in the Democrat race (as shown in the poll above) ok? ANSWER NOW.

Where are the answers to the questions I asked you below, Justin?

You're afraid to answer. You haven't got the spine to get into a discussion of the uses of racial division in politics.

Justin Higgins: liar and coward. Kinda has a ring to it -- the ring of truth.

You're the one avoiding the question. Do you defend the fact that there is such a racial divide in the way Democrats are voting? Is it right? ANSWER.

"You're afraid to defend the Democrats on the racial divide obviously. Posed with a simple question, asking if you're willing to defend them, you focus on the use of the word assault instead of answering the posed question."

That's because you used the word "assault" to describe the act of asking questions, wormdropping. Your oh-poor-widdle-Justin-as-victim act is asinine.

As for your question: It's a fallacy. Tell me why, idiot.

The dems are barely friends to the blacks. Just as they are barely friends to Unions (and the allegiance of both minorities to the party are purely the remnants of the loyalty they have due to what certain dems did for them decades ago). Dems are purely the lesser of two evils for both segments.

One only has to look at the the way Jesse Jackson's campaigns were treated, particularly in 1988 (although that MAY have had more to do with his progressive ideas, such as fixing health care and all that).

I'd say that the attitude of highly placed dems probably is that of geraldine ferraro's, who seemingly called out Obama as merely the product of affirmative action last week.

You're afraid to defend the Democrats on the racial divide obviously. Posed with a simple question, asking if you're willing to defend them, you focus on the use of the word assault instead of answering the posed question. It obviously shows that you're unwilling to answer your own tactic, throwing questions at people. The funny thing is, the question posed to you was actually related to the topic at hand. Are you or are you not disgusted by the racial divide in the Democrat Primary and WHY?

Gotta love that wingnut victim mentality...

SOMEONE ASKED JUSTIN SOME QUESTIONS! OH MY GOD!!!! THE POOR BOY HAS BEEN ASSAULTED! OH THE BLOOD! CALL THE POLICE! CALL THE LIFE SQUAD! OH THE HORROR!! OH THE HUMANITY!!!

Thanks for the laugh, halfwit.

Why won't you defend the Democrats first then before you assault Justin? Are you racist enough to say that the racial divide is fine. RUN AWAY, LITTLE LIAR.

1) In the context of 20th century American politics, what was the "Southern strategy", and which American political party employed it?

2) In the year 2000, which American political operative set up a poll that asked voters in the South Carolina primary, “Would you be more or less likely to vote for John McCain... if you knew he had fathered an illegitimate black child?” Which political party did that operative work for?

Run away, little liar.